Recygal Biography

Tetra Pak®- Building a Foundation for Carton Recycling with Aseptic Bricks

When we think of recycling beverage containers, the plastic bottle or the aluminum can come to mind. The prolific use and discard of these holders of liquids has spurred us on to enact anti-litter laws, collect used bottles and cans, and to recycle. As systems to recycle beverage containers evolve, our focus (at least in the USA) seems to still revolve around the collection of PET plastic, aluminum cans, and glass. While advancements in packaging technology have brought us beverage products packaged in “long life packaging” like the Tetrapak® aseptic brick, little has been done (at least in our country) to “sort out” how these useful multi-material packages can be recycled. For those of you who are wondering what a Tetrapak® aseptic brick is, I’ll give you a brief overview.

The name Tetra Pak® has become synonymous with the aseptic brick packageTetra Pak aseptic bricks (an innovative packaging process that allows liquid food stuffs to remain shelf stable without preservatives or refrigeration). Since the early 1950s, Tetra Pak®, a Swedish company, has been packaging liquid milk in aseptic cartons. Today, with operations in over 165 countries, its cartons are used for juices, wines, soups, and sauces too. To learn more visit: Tetra® Pak

Comprised of 6 layers of materials, the Tetra Pak® aseptic brick allows for light weight, efficient, non-refrigerated shipment and storage of liquid foods.

To have a close look at a Tetra Pak® carton for yourself, just visit your grocer’s child-size juice section. In the USA, many “on the go” parents depend on Tetra Pak® packaged juices to keep their toddlers happy and well hydrated. So, what about milk?

By the time Tetra Pak® got its start, the USA was already developing wide spread refrigerated distribution. Remember the milkman? While the milkman serviced regional dairies and local communities, the advent of superhighways enabled trucking companies to expand distribution across the country. As trucking companies expanded so too did the distribution of refrigerated food stuffs; Americans everywhere were enjoying fresh milk.

In our fresh milk market, the Tetra Pak® concept has not fared so well; utilizing a process coined “UHT” (ultra high temperature) the milk is heated for a shorter time and at a higher temperature than the process used to produce fresh milk (pasteurization). The UHT milk (now free of all bacteria) is filled into a sterile carton (brick) creating a shelf stable, long life product. Given the higher temperature of processing required for UHT, the inherent milk sugars caramelize and give the UHT milk a bit of a “cooked” flavor rather than the familiar “fresh” taste Americans prefer. This difference in milk flavor has kept Tetra Pak® from establishing a large share of the USA liquid milk market. For beverages where UHT processing does not adversely affect flavor such as chocolate milk and juices, the aseptic brick has found better consumer acceptance.

Given that worldwide two thirds of all Tetra Pak® bricks are used for packaging milk, if a market does not have a large share of its milk packaged in aseptic bricks, it is conceivable the market development for this type of packaging will be marginal. With the average American consuming 13.5 gallons of non-flavored milk per year (equivalent to over 16 billion 32oz Tetra Paks® of milk) that is a market you do not want to be a marginal player in! However, it seems that Tetra Pak® only has a marginal share of the huge, non-flavored milk market and so concentrates in the niche for flavored milks, juices, and soup bases. So, how does Tetra Pak’s® niche position affect the recycling for aseptic bricks in the USA?

In order to develop a sound recycling system for any material, there must be a sizable volume of material to reclaim. Without a steady supply of reclaimed material, efficient processing and market development for the recyclable cannot come to fruition. Because the aseptic brick is a multilayer package of several materials, it takes ingenuity and special techniques to separate the various components and to reclaim them. In markets like the USA where Tetra Pak® use is less main- stream, emphasis on developing reclamation techniques and an infrastructure to support them is not top priority. Here in the USA, many eco-conscious consumers still think the recycling process for aseptic brick packaging is either not possible or “very expensive and awkward, and is therefore only available in a very few places”. So, what happens to the cartons when junior has finished his apple juice? Sadly, in the USA many of these cartons do not get recycled. However, in established European markets, like Germany, aseptic bricks have recycle rates greater than 65%. And, in developing markets where Tetra Pak® technology has gained a foothold due to lack of refrigerated distribution, recycling advances have grown right alongside milk sales. Recycling Tetra Pak® does not have to be “expensive and awkward “, it just needs to be done with a common sense approach that fits the particular market.

Because the aseptic brick is composed of about 75% long fiber paper, 20% low density polyethylene, and 5% aluminum, the paper market is the most developed downstream use for reclaimed aseptic bricks. The paper fibers are recovered at paper mills and make “excellent raw material for the corrugated paperboard sector”. The process to separate the paper from other materials in the brick is called hydrapulping. Basically, hydrapulping uses water and industrial strength blenders to separate the paper from the polyethylene and aluminum layers. The paper is recovered, leaving the polyethylene and aluminum as a residual.

Depending on the particular recycling market, the polyethylene and aluminum residual can be repurposed in a variety of ways. In Germany, the residual is used by the cement industry for energy recovery and bauxite replacement whereas Brazil uses it to make products like roofing materials, buckets, and brooms.

To see how Tetra Paks® are recycled in a developing nation like India, please watch this video from Mumbai:

If a complete separation of materials is required, a novel process called thermal plasma technology can be employed. After the paper has been recovered, the aluminum/polyethylene residual is heated to a high temperature in the absence of oxygen. When polyethylene is heated to a high temperature it does not burn but breaks down into smaller particles forming paraffin. The aluminum melts down and is recovered as highly pure ingots. The plasma technology is very efficient: “90% of energy yield is actually achieved in the process.” Emissions are near zero.

So, now that we have established that aseptic brick packaging is recyclable, where is recycling available? Currently, beverage carton recycling (including the aseptic brick) is available curbside in at least half of our states. Fourteen states (CA, CO, CT, FL, IL, MA, ME, MI, NJ, NY, OH, RI, UT, WA) have many communities which collect used cartons. Eight states have 3 to 10 communities with collection (AZ, GA, LA, MS, MN, NC, NE, OR), and three states have only 1 community which collects: (PA, TX, LA). Oh, and Washington, D.C. collects cartons for recycling too. According to Tetra Pak®, “20% of total US residents across 26 states (they’re counting Washington, D.C. as a state) have access to carton recycling”. With 25 states not even having one community with collection, there is a long way to go to recycle all the used beverage cartons (including regular “gable top” cartons used for fresh milk and juices too). To find out if your community has curbside collection of beverage cartons, Click Here.

To wrap it up, I’d like to mention a wonderful aseptic brick packaging endeavor. A Canadian company based in Québec, Groupe RCM, is working with the Québec government, Narel (a dairy cooperative), A. Lassonde Inc., (a fruit juice company) and Tetra Pak®, to build a recycling facility to recycle plastic and paper waste, “specifically Tetra Pak® aseptic containers…as well as plastic (low-density polyethylene) bags and films”. The facility will utilize a high-speed “thermokinetic” process developed by the Québec Center of Industrial Research. What is so amazing about Groupe RCM is that it is an organization with the mission to provide jobs for handicapped people and to better the environment. Groupe RCM collaborates with the regional Center of Services for Intellectual Deficiencies and provides employment for many mentally deficient individuals. The new recycling facility will add 65 more jobs that will be mostly filled by handicapped workers. I can’t give Groupe RCM enough kudos for keeping waste out of landfills and providing meaningful employment to disabled persons. Learn more at:Groupe RCM.

Come on America, with aseptic brick recycling examples like those in Canada and India, we can definitely do more!

© 2010 Recycle Life, LLC
The RecyGalTM logo and the RecyGalTM character are trademarks and registered copyights of Recycle Life , LLC

References for this article were obtained from: “Empowering the Bottom of the Pyramid via Product Stewardship: Tetra Pak Entrepreneurial Networks in Brazil”, Orsato, Renato, et.al, October 10, 2007, INSEAD Business School, Fontainebleau, France, “How is a juice box made?”, www.answers.com, “Tetra Pak and wine: a low carbon footprint alternative package”,www.wineenabler.com, Neil, January 25, 2009, “Commonly Recycled Materials- Aseptic Packaging” , www.obviously.com, “Refrigerated Transportation Timeline, pre-WWII”, www.33brinkster.com, “Got Data? Multiple Data Sources Track U.S. Food Consumption”, Morrison, R., et.al, March 2009, www.ers.usda.gov, www.tetrapak.com, www.aseptic.org, “A great leap forward for waste diversion- $3.5M investment in Groupe RCM plant in Yamachiche: Tetra Pak cartons, milk cartons, plastic bags and films can now be recycled into new products”, November 2009, www.newswire.ca, “Division Recuperation”, www.groupercm.com

Tell a Friend Tell a Friend

9 Responses to “Tetra Pak®- Building a Foundation for Carton Recycling with Aseptic Bricks”

  1. Scott Gardner says:

    This is a fascinating story. I’m sure the efficiencies of square or rectangular packakging relative to round bottles and cans has further positive impact for
    our environment.

    I would also be curious about the energy required to make this package and its probable benefits.

    Weight must also provide carbon savings compared with glass.

    Great work Recygal !!!!

  2. Recygal says:

    Hi Scott,

    Thanks for the comments; they are greatly appreciated. To give you an idea of the energy savings Tetra Pak can have on a product’s packaging environmental footprint, here are some statistics I found about packaging wine in aseptic bricks versus bottles at http://www.wineenabler.com: “Tetra Pak cartons use 90% less packaging to deliver the same amount of wine; 54% less energy than that of glass bottles throughout the entire life cycle; create 80% less greenhouse gases; 35-40% fewer trucks to deliver the same amount of wine if compared to glass bottles”. One Canadian company, Yellow + Blue specializes in organic wines “delivered in an earth-friendly way”. Yellow + Blue imports grapes in bulk from Argentina, produces wine, and then packages the wine in aseptic bricks which reduces the carbon footprint by 50% when compared to shipping the wine in bottles directly from Argentina. Cheers! -R.G.

  3. Milo Galindo says:

    Hi RecyGal, first I wanted to say that this is a great article and really liked it, actually I like many LOL.

    Second I wanted to know if there is any other way to completly separate all the materials besides thermal plasma technology?, I know that last year in Beijing a guy called Zhang Ji-Fei said that he could do it using methanoic acid. I would love to learn about it and eventually be able to do it.

  4. Recygal says:

    Hi Juan,

    Thanks for commenting. Yes, a paper was published last year, “Research on the Wet Process Separation Conditions of Aluminum and Polyethylene in the Tetra-Pak Packages,” by Zhang Ji-fei, et al, describing a laboratory experiment designed to determine the best weak acid that could be used to separate the Aluminum from LDPE which remain after the paper is removed from the aseptic package during hydrapulping. The work is a bench top experiment. Further work must be conducted to determine the feasiblity for industrial use. While the paper industry has its share of chemical use, the separation of paper from the aseptic brick is a mechanical process and the separation of Aluminum and LDPE downstream with plasma technology seems to be non-polluting creating pure aluminum and paraffin (vitually no emissions, with over a 90% energy recovery rate). Incorporating an acid into the downstream process entails proper substrate size (AL:LPDE laminate), acid concentration, time and temperature to achieve proper separation. Additionally, proper disposal of the “wet” slurry containing any non-reacted acid is an additional environmental issue for the recovery facility. If you would like to recreate the experiment, you can access the paper for a minimal fee at: http://www.eee.org. It is a meaningful experiment that one day may lead to a feasible industrial process. -R.G.

  5. Milo Galindo says:

    Thanks, as always you are very helpful.

    I’m going to buy the paper.

    Keep your hard work, I’ll be cheering :-)

  6. Recygal says:

    Hi Juan,

    Thanks for the kind words. It is a pleasure sharing information with other people who care about recycling as much as I do. -R.G.

  7. Bharath K says:

    Hi,

    I would like to know what are the different forms of packaging liquid milk?

    Milk is widely packaged in HDPE/LDPE Films in Indian Market?

    One of the alternatives is Tetra pack, but it has not gained popularity.

    But are there any other alternatives to this or any latest break through packaging technologies?

    Why Dairy companies in India prefer HDPE/LDPE Films to Tetra pack?

    Regards,
    Bharath

  8. Recygal says:

    Hi Bharath,

    Thanks for your questions regarding the packaging of milk; I’ll try my best to answer them. Liquid milk can be packaged in bottles (plastic and glass), cartons, cans, aseptic briks, and polyethylene films. In the USA, where “fresh” milk flavor is preferred by consumers, milk is pasteurized and packaged mostly in bottles and cartons. While the pasteurization process will kill off harmful bacteria, the milk must be shipped and stored under refrigeration. Pasteurization is a feasible technique for markets where refrigerated distribution is widespread.

    In emerging markets like India, where the refrigerated food distribution system may be in its infancy and where a large percentage of household income is dedicated to food, sterilization of milk is the preferred process. By sterilizing the liquid milk, the milk can be transported and stored without refrigeration. Non-refrigerated product is more readily distributable and costs less to do so.

    To the best of my knowledge, there are two commercialized technologies for packaging sterilized milk: aspetic brik and polyethylene film. The aspetic brik process (often branded as Tetra Pak) requires a multi-layered package made from several materials. This complex package not only preserves the milk, but is designed to ship efficiently. Widely used in Europe, this technology was introduced in the USA in the 1980′s where it was not well accepted by liquid milk consumers. USA consumers did not like the taste; when milk is sterilized the inherent sugars carmelize creating a milk flavor which is distinct from “fresh” milk. Despite current opinion, Americans do not always like change! Their dislike for change extends to consumer packed polyethylene film milk too. Polyethylene film technology, developed and marketed by Dupont, is gaining ground in the developing dairy markets of India and China where large populations demand safe, inexpensive shelf stable foods like liquid milk. To best answer your questions, I contacted Dupont directly, but I have yet to hear back; so I am providing my personal opinion on why polyethylene film may be more popular than Tetra Pak in India. Simply stated, I believe Dupont is committed to penetrating a large developing market like India with a proven, lower cost (than aseptic brik) milk packaging technology. I believe Dupont is committed because the company has established polyethylene packaging facilities in Mumbai. Polyethylene films are less complex, less expensive, and more readily recyclable than aseptic brik paks. Polyethylene film technology seems to meet the econoimic and distribution demands of the Indian market. I hope this helps to answer your questions. And, if and when I hear back from Dupont, I will post their response too.

    Thanks so much for your questions. I really like hearing from my readers. -R.G.

  9. Carlene Lancaster says:

    Incredibly awesome read! Really..

Leave a Reply

To subscribe to my blog and receive updated postings, please enter your email here

Find Great Recycling Products at

RecyGal
© 2011 Recycle Life LLC.